The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003-2012.
The given graph provides information about the changes in the number of burglary, car theft and robbery over time in an urban area of Manchester between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, burglary saw a dramatic decrease during the period while car theft slightly increased with some fluctuations. The number of robbery in Manchester remained relatively stable from 2003 to 2012.
The amount of burglary in manchester rose slightly before slipped back and hit the low point of just over 1000 in 2008. Despite its small growth in 2009, burglary remained unchanged until the end of the period. In contrast, car theft experienced a long period of fluctuation between 2003 and 2009; however, it gradually went up afterwards to almost 3000 in 2012.
Unsimilar to the first two categories, robbery stayed relatively stable over time remained at just over 500 cases. However, its number at the beginning of the period, saw some fluctuations, rose to just under a thousand in 2005 and dropped to the same level in 2006.
- Print media including magazines and newspapers will soon be completely replaced by internet news sources To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- People living in cities today do not get enough exercise Why What can be done to solve this problem 78
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 90
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01796407186 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6502130835 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562874251497 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4448479518 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124076413252 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628205853906 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826152871803 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910197875651 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667741831369 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.