The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten-year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The line graphs illustrate the numbers of local and international students who attended universities in Australia between 2001 and 2010. Overall, during a decade, the numbers of abroad university students in commencing and total both increase considerably. The enrolments of Australian learners also rose significantly in total, while fluctuated markedly in commencing.
There was a dramatic growth in numbers of enrolments of oversea students in total. According to the graph, the rate of students from other countries starting their degrees in Australia rose from 20,000 to above 80,000 in number. Similarly, the 400000 inland enrolments were made in 2001 and jumped to 600000 in 2007, then they remained stable for 3 years.
To be specific in commencing, the numbers of enrollment from around the grew, while the local ones remained relatively stable. Internationally, the numbers of applications of abroad students were accepted around 10000 in 2001 and rose markedly to 40000 in 2009, then they tempered off in 2010. In the same way, around 15000 Australians enrolled in commencing during 2001. However, there was a plateau started in 2002 to 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-30 | xuanhieu26 | 90 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | jessepinkman22 | 79 | view |
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph shows the Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females in Australia who were overweight from 1980 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The flow chart below details the hiring process of a company Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- True friends should always support each other s decisions To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, then, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44751381215 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95821144043 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5262970533 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155714578601 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689172285807 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452187157661 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116880309238 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034034315469 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.