The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012
The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012
The given graph presents information about the variation of three different tipes of crime in New Port city between the years 2003 and 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a downward trend in the number of burglaries, while thefts remained low but steady.
As regards burglaries, the figure started at about 3500, which was the highest figure in 2003. After that, there was a significant decrease to approximately 1500 in 2007 reaching the peak at just over 1000 in 2008. Next, there was a sligth increase at around 1500 in 2009. From 2009 to 2012 the figure levelled off at around 1500 ending at about 1400 in 2012.
In contrast , in 2003 the number of incidents by robberies was the lowest compared to the crime rate of both burglary and car theft. The number of thefts fluctuated mildly for the whole period, reaching the bottom at around 600 in 2012.
Regarding the car thefts rate, the figure started at about 2700 in 2003, having remained stable for 2 years, then fell sharply hitting the peak at approximately 2000 in . In 2012 the number of car thefts saw a rise to rougly 3000 , exceeding the number of burglaries, which had only about 1500.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng at about 1400 in 2012. In contrast , in 2003 the number of incidents by robb...
^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...itting the peak at approximately 2000 in . In 2012 the number of car thefts saw a ...
^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of car thefts saw a rise to rougly 3000 , exceeding the number of burglaries, whi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, then, while, as regards, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69162995595 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36886307906 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550660792952 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.355864449 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301524724102 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108141500076 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.229487373703 0.0843802449381 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245232928978 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.352305884995 0.0819641961636 430% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.