The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city center from 2003 2012

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city center from 2003-2012.

The given line graph demonstrate.the information about the three main areas of crime in the centre of new port city from 2003 to 2012.
It's clear that, Around 3400incidences of burglary in 2003 and reached about a peak point is that 3700 in 2004. after that , in the next 4 years it fell down sharply and reached about 1100 incidences in 2008. However, it grew by 300accidents and remained stable till 2012.
Moving ahead, the car theft was steady Level of crime from 2003 to 2004. After that, in the next five years it was fluctuation level and reached about 2250 in 2010. After that it's increased to 2700in 2012 as compared, robbery reached its peak point in 2005, however, which was 900 cases and decreased back to 500 in 2008. In the 4 years it was remained stable and reached about 500 incidences in same intial Year of level in 2012.
Overall, the rate of burglary declined sharply. The level of robbery remained constant in all year. Moreover, car theft raised and had the biggest number of incidences in 2012.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (24 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...bout a peak point is that 3700 in 2004. after that , in the next 4 years it fell down...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...k point is that 3700 in 2004. after that , in the next 4 years it fell down sharpl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63535911602 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42743372486 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519337016575 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.549517268 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2727272727 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148693557173 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599974883413 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977886137709 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122084952016 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131885833642 0.0819641961636 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.