The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in the New Port City center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in the New Port City center from 2003-2012
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The information about the number of cases from three types of crimes in the New Port City center between 2003 and 2012 is illustrated in a line graph.

Overall, the number of incidents from burglary's crime saw the highest figure, but it fell dramatically over the years. Meanwhile, the figure for car theft was dominated in the last period.

In 2003, the figure for the crime of Burglary saw the most dangerous with just under 3500 cases, followed by car theft. Meanwhile, the perpetrators of Robbery accounted for a considerably lowest number with just above 500 incidents. By 2012, the number of car theft incidents had a slight decrease, but it turned out to be the highest number. Whereas for Robbery's crime had a make up the same number with the first period.

Between 2004 and 2011, Burglary incidents decreased significantly until the middle of the year, with continuing to increase to 1500 cases. When it came to car theft, the perpetrator was a slight decrease, but it bounced back to about 2500 incidents. However, the rest of the crime showed some changes, and still in the smallest number for over the years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'considerably the lowest'.
Suggestion: considerably the lowest
...perpetrators of Robbery accounted for a considerably lowest number with just above 500 incidents. B...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...it turned out to be the highest number. Whereas for Robberys crime had a make up the sa...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85492227979 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57902042351 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8157840102 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124376627641 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552181955143 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849515708773 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106922571218 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110728254014 0.0819641961636 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.