The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France
in 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts compare energy production from various sources in France in two years
1995 and 2005.
It is clear that the percentage of energy produced from Coal was highest in both years. Additionally, while energy production from Coal, Gas and Nuclear all increased in 2005, the figures for Petro and Other types of energy experienced significant decreases.
In 1995, the proportion of energy produced from Coal in France was highest, at 29.80%, while the figures for Gas and Petro were slightly lower, at 29.63% and 29.27% respectively. By contrast, only 6.40% of the total energy was produced from Nuclear. Meanwhile, other sources made up only 4.90% of the total production.
In 2005, the percentage of energy created from Coal went up insignificantly to 30.93% and remained the highest figure in the chart. The figure for Gas rose slowly to 30.31%, while Petro’s energy production experienced a dramatic fall of nearly 10% to only 19.55%. Meanwhile, there were sharp increases in the figures for Nuclear and Other sources to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m various sources in France in two years 1995 and 2005. It is clear that the p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24277456647 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77071022963 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7892139553 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170056912196 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871817509951 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798473420568 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115512547458 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376059835065 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.