The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table shows data about the number of miles covered by 8 different means of transportation in two year 1985 and 2000 in England.
It is clear from the table that car was by far the most popular type of transportation in the UK in two years. Additionally, all modes of travel experienced increases in the total miles traveled with the exception of local bus and bicycle.
In 1985, the distance traveled by car was highest, at 3,199 miles, while the number for Other types of transport and local bus were significantly lower, at 450 and 429 miles respectively. In the same year, long distance bus inly covered 54 miles, compared to 51 miles traveled by bicycle. Taxi was the lowest figure in 1985, at only 13 miles.
In 2000, there were 585 miles traveled by Other means of transportation, while the number for car was highest, at 4,806 miles. While train had a 77 miles increase to 366 miles, the distance covered by walking declined slightly to 237 miles. At the same time, the number of miles traveled by bicycle and taxi were relatively lower, at 41 and 42 miles respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...d increases in the total miles traveled with the exception of local bus and bicycle. In 1985, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.703125 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70920959382 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510416666667 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.898647201 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145980414716 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733184400281 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643986209468 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119979414392 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692973773614 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.