The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons.

The table illustrates the average distances of English people travelling by different means of transport from 1985 to 2000, measured in miles.

Overall, it is noticeable that the average miles travelled by the Englishes for all forms of travelling except walking, bicycle and local bus, increased significantly. Car is the vehicle which was used more than any others over the period shown.

According to the estatistics, the number of miles travelled by car in 1985 was 3199, and this rose to 4806 in the year 2000. Similarly, the average distance travelled by long distance bus, train, taxi and other modes also increased in the given period. It can be seen that the most significant change in the figure of miles was for taxi, with a threefold rise from 13 to 42 in 1985 and 2000 respectively.

In contrast, the was a slight decrease in the miles which English people travelled in three forms, namely walking, bicycle and local bus. The Englishes walked an average of 255 in 1985 and fell by 18 to 237 in 2000. The biggest downward change was in the use of local buses with average miles per person falling from 429 to 274 over the period of 15 years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, as for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72906403941 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54504899399 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541871921182 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.20975653 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123827085834 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591312018462 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03642620541 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874597131776 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371819996795 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.