The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons.
The table compares difference in modes of transportation used in England, in terms of miles per person per year, between the years 1985 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the total miles traveled per person per year were generally increased. However, most people in England preferred cars in both years, while taxis were the least used by travelers back then.
To commence with, in England, bicycles have lost some popularity as miles traveled using this mode decreased by 10 miles per person per year. Similarly, miles per person per year walked declined from 255 in 1985 to 237 in 2000. Likewise, the local buses which fell abruptly to almost the half.
The trend is reversed with regards to taxis which people prefer more than before and increased by 29 miles per person per year. Trains and long distant buses has faced a satisfying growth in which trains increased by more than 70 miles per person per year, while long distant bus doubled with in a 15 year period. Cars saved its place as the most preferred mean of conveyance and miles traveled per person per year were 3199 and 4800 in the years 1985 and 2000 respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76767676768 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30612940517 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8828684321 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0827134692871 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499355117901 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492290085525 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811060032995 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505815204794 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.