Renowned and successful sports professionals earn a lot more than people in other important professions. While many people think that it is unfair, a large group of people say that this is totally justified.
What is your viewpoint on this issue?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Today, famous athletes receive their salaries with paramount figures which surpassed doctors and even lawyers income. Some people argue the legitimacy of this matter. However, other people asserted that sport professionals deserve their high salaries.
On one hand, seasoned athletes salaries create a debate among public. Some people argue this issue and consider their payments as lavish and extravagence as well as a waste of money. Furthermore, it is thought that those money should be transferred to support careers that serve the community. Teachers, doctors and lawyers exemplified careers that present a countless services to the community as a whole.
On the other hand, there are several reasons that legitimated the high professional athletes payments. One reason is that their skills are derived from a perseverant training from early years of their lives. Besides, the training consume a significant part of their time, which hinders the possibility of having another job to make a living. Another reason to be mentioned, sports professionals fame commenced early and faded after 10 years or less. After that, they have to count on the money they made to precede their lives. In addition, they are considered as a positive portray to a country in world championships.
To conclude, I believe that the lustrous position of those seasoned athletes reached through a tremendous discipline to training as well as their perseverance. Hence, they should payed a rewarding salaries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lawyers'' or 'lawyer's'?
Suggestion: lawyers'; lawyer's
...igures which surpassed doctors and even lawyers income. Some people argue the legitimac...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
... money. Furthermore, it is thought that those money should be transferred to support career...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'service'?
Suggestion: service
...lified careers that present a countless services to the community as a whole. On the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun years is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...enced early and faded after 10 years or less. After that, they have to count on the ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to a country in world championships. To conclude, I believe that the lustrou...
^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'salary'?
Suggestion: salary
...e. Hence, they should payed a rewarding salaries.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42918454936 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83052335088 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583690987124 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1054786748 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5333333333 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108153844381 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430696750408 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714457543839 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725849948735 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677460936158 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.