It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Some people claim that lustrous musicians and sports professionals have innate talent and only individuals who had that talent can give such extraordinarily performance. Nevertheless, others people argue that training can transform ordinary child to professional even with out the presence of intrinsic gift.
On one hand, some people advocate the notion of performance quality depend on training more than talent itself. In sports, recent technologies provide trainees the correct methods, steps and guidelines to enhance performance. Those methods designed for any person who has the enthusiasm to learn and succeed, and it is not restricted on talented individuals. Take olympics as example. It is clear that huge numbers of participants with extremely good performance came out from years of training and shows a great deal of perseverance form players. Those certainly can not compete relying on their mere talent.
On the other hand, an intrinsic talent may be a tremendously good start to expertise in. With Regards to drawing, for instance, lack of intrinsic talent would retard significantly individuals progression in the competitive art sector. Another example to be mentioned, music talent TV shows can clearly discriminate the individuals with innate gifts. Besides, through the episodes, it is obvious that training of raw talents result in unprecedentedly marvelous performances.
To conclude, I believe that best performers around the globe, combine the intrinsic aptitude with perseverant training. Otherwise, a talent with out training will eventually diminished.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...orm ordinary child to professional even with out the presence of intrinsic gift. On ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...rseverant training. Otherwise, a talent with out training will eventually diminished.
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'diminish'
Suggestion: diminish
...alent with out training will eventually diminished.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74152542373 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14643966909 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652542372881 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7707153319 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208580156883 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643545074831 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465204483207 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122701107623 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481771164961 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.