Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Other disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Today, people argue that tourists should follow local traditions of the visited cities. However, other people assert that locals should accept cultural disparity and be amicable with travelers.
On one hand, tourists often spend their holidays abroad away from their home countries for recreational purposes. It is intricate to force a traveler to do something that he or she never used to do it before, though, imposing unfamiliar rules may irritate and annoy tourists. This may transfer a rigorous portray regarding the whole nation, and this in turn may impact heavily the tourism sector in that city. Take Iran for example. Despite the extra ordinary landscapes they have, people avoid vacating there due to their hijab obligations to women. In other words, such behavior antagonize the concept of tourism.
On the other hand, inhabitants of a touristic city should be more amicable with their visitors, for a myriad of reasons. One reason is that tourism boosts the city economically and increase paramountly the average financial status of city dwellers. Job opportunities, new building and various facilities are all merits of travelers inflow to the city. Another reason to be mentioned, behavior of locals to tourists draw a world wide image on the national personality as a whole. Moreover, if tourists enjoyed the place they have visited, they will recommend it to their friends and relatives, therefore, travelers considered as an everlasting advertisement for the place they visited.
To conclude, I believe that imposing restrains on tourists is paradoxical to the tourism concept. Locals should recognize the methods that allure more travelers. Hence, a renowned touristic city brings along wealth and prosperity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
..., behavior of locals to tourists draw a world wide image on the national personality as a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
..., behavior of locals to tourists draw a world wide image on the national personality as a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41328413284 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7817934902 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3232304521 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13769785836 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487665140574 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632698127773 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105511732637 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849659732741 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.