The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.

The table describes data of how British people change the use of different modes of transportation from 1985 to 2000.

Overall, it is clear that the average distance in miles travelled per person yearly, by all modes of travel has increased. In addition, the number of cars used was by far of other modes.

In 1985, the use of taxi accounted for the lowest distance of people in England, at 13 miles, while travel by cars had the significant number in use, which was 3,199 miles per year. There was a similar number of average distance in miles in terms of walking, train, other and local bus, ranging from 255 to 450 miles.

In comparison, there was a decrease in the distance of walking, bicycle and local bus over the period of 15 years. In contrast, a majority of British people chose car as a main transport in daily travel, which rose from 3,199 to 4,806 within 15-year period. Other use of transport had less attention of commuters, such as train and other, whereas, taxi and long distance bus were grown steeply in the distance of travel, from 13 to 42 miles and 54 to 124 miles respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 171, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'main transport'.
Suggestion: main transport
...majority of British people chose car as a main transport in daily travel, which rose from 3,199 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65151515152 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46704635601 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550505050505 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0573745135 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128349558594 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654876298255 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799702466367 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110160094237 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794650509194 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.