The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years1995 and 2005.
The two pie charts depict the facts and figures of five different types of energy production in France between 1995 and 2005. Units are measured in percentage.
As it can be clearly noticed, Gas and Coal were the two commonly used energy, which constituted more than half the production. Meanwhile, There was a nominal change in nuclear and other types of energy production for over a decade.
Likewise, energy generated by gas made up 29.63% in 1995 and only increased about a mere 1% in 2005. Correspondingly, the energy produced by coal took over 29.80% in 1995 and demonstrate a marginal development of 1% after 10 years. On the other hand, Petrol was the only remaining source of energy which fell off considerably about 10% after a decade.
In a nutshell, Gas and Coal will continuously by far be the most used energy in France and there will be an increasing demand for the use of Nuclear and other types of energy as well. However, Petrol is unlikely to be commonly used in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-25 | buitrunghieu | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 61
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 89
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years1995 and 2005. 70
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, Californiaand the rest of the world. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69720338915 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3497058903 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197202622235 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814276543771 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102698511812 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139154069698 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103441856328 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.