The bar chart depicts information about being distinctive on acquiring after school degrees between genders in Australia as indicated in vertical axis. The horizontal axis points out the ratio in hundredfold percentage.
Now turning to the detail, nine-tenths of males gained accomplished vocational diploma while females marked the smallest percentage in 1999. The number of undergraduate women doubled about 70% and was higher than men's proportion which was somewhere in the vicinity of 35% .
On the one hand, males erected their number on post graduation just around 70% as females witnessed fewer than opposite gender. The ratio of men and women on bachelor remained the same level with less contract as master's degree experienced a smaller soar just around 40% among females as a result of males numbers were at 60%.
As is observed in the graph, the vast majority of males experienced a swiftly acclivity at each level by contrast, females saw a gradual declivity in the same year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ich was somewhere in the vicinity of 35% . On the one hand, males erected their n...
^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber on post graduation just around 70% as females witnessed fewer than opposite...
^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('swiftly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('acclivity') instead of another adjective.
... the vast majority of males experienced a swiftly acclivity at each level by contrast, females saw ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19375 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76571234402 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0289462062 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137826840859 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535370030874 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364137108336 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714912520265 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245689210125 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.