A glance at the bar chart provided reveals the information about the sales mobile phone in various brand during 2009, 2011 and 2013. The amout of units sales mobile phone in million.
As an overall, both Samsung and Apple were a significant increase troughtout the entire period. While nokia and LG were a marginal decrease, and ZTE remain stable over the period.
Looking for the detail, in 2009 the figure for the samsung sales mobile, there was just over 200 millions units and increased noticeablly two time at the end of period. In contrast nokia was popular trend in 2009, it started at nearly 450 millions before decline to approximately 150 units million in 2013.
Apple sales mobile phone was a soar eight fold over the period. It about 20 millions units and soar to around 160 million. While the brand for LG deceease slightly by 10 millions units each year and ZTE sales mobile was remain stable at around 50 units millions over the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...he amout of units sales mobile phone in million. As an overall, both Samsung and App...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ablly two time at the end of period. In contrast nokia was popular trend in 2009, it sta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...fore decline to approximately 150 units million in 2013. Apple sales mobile phone wa...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...nits each year and ZTE sales mobile was remain stable at around 50 units millions over...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78915662651 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27835912616 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0478856943 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184537026573 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989234971907 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101461282288 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137188158339 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133056100962 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.