The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013

The bar chart compares the different percentages of resident in USA consuming fast food at restaurants in frequency groups during the period of ten years.
Overall, The most part of people tent to decrease to use the fast food during the period shown. It is also noticeable that the American who ate the fast food once or twice a month accounted a highest proportion in 2013.
At the first glance, in 2006, the percentage of people using fast food not much twice a month and a few in a years were 30% and 13%, respectively, while these figures for the same level in 2013 increase slightly to nearly 33% and 15% respectively. On the other hand, there were a downturn in the amount of people eating this food at least once a week. In 2003, they were around 17% and 32% respectively, whereas these figures in 2013 is around 13% people using fast food several times a week and 27% American using once a week.
Turning to two remaining groups, they are apparently similar in the down trend. Using everyday and never in their life was a choice of around 5% each in 2006, but it is just around 4% each in 2013.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...st food once or twice a month accounted a highest proportion in 2013. At the fi...
^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a year' or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: a year; years
...ood not much twice a month and a few in a years were 30% and 13%, respectively, while t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...rently similar in the down trend. Using everyday and never in their life was a choice of...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, so, whereas, while, at least, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45320197044 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42479647459 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566502463054 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8820633917 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249771465809 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106022981748 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610630110305 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146119287591 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713976093843 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.