The graph depicts the percentage of people in the USA eating frequently in junk food restaurant during10 years since 2003. The most significant facts to emerge from the graph are that the figure for once or twice a month and that for a few times a year experienced an increase while other frequencies witnessed a decrease.
Looking in details, it is clearly seen that there was a growth of once or twice a month figure, rising slightly from around 30 to about 33 -the greatest proportion of eating frequency at fast food restaurant in 2006. Likewise, a few time a year figure saw a gradual increase to roughly 15 before leveling off at the end of the timeline.
However, the figures several times a week and that for once a week had a similar pattern. Not only did the former climb to nearly 33 in 2006 and witnessed a noticeable fall to approximately 27 but the latter rose to roughly 33 and then declined to 27 as well in 2013. At the same time, the timeline experienced a moderate drop in the proportion of people eating every day and never in a fast food restaurant in 2006 before remaining stable at around 2 the smallest percentage of eating frequency at fast food restaurant during over 10 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her frequencies witnessed a decrease. Looking in details, it is clearly seen t...
^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the greatest'.
Suggestion: -the the greatest
...ing slightly from around 30 to about 33 -the greatest proportion of eating frequency at fast ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...st food restaurant in 2006. Likewise, a few time a year figure saw a gradual increase to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, look, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57603686636 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64829051086 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552995391705 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8539037651 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.857142857 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165579799996 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783122945328 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972529754115 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113720346762 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343204574435 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.