The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph provides information about the consumption of fast food in the USA from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, the largest percentage of Americans eats at these type of restaurants once a week or once or twice a month and only a small number of them eat every day at fast food.
During the first considered year, the 32% of people eat at fast food only once a week. This date is similar to the 2006 one, which is about 33%. Although during the 2013 there is a decrease in this trend with only 28% of Americans eating fast food, the date remains very high. People who eat junk food every day are very low in all three years, with a mean percentage of about 3.5%.
In 2013 there is a reduction in the frequency of eating at fast food, as a matter of fact the highest percentage consumes fast food only once or twice a month. The numbers of Americans who have never eaten fast food is terribly low, with only a mean rate of 4%, a date similar to every day one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... week or once or twice a month and only a small number of them eat every day at fast food. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 278, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to everyday'?
Suggestion: to everyday
... only a mean rate of 4%, a date similar to every day one.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29891304348 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19153186362 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505434782609 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4511659621 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180229983693 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097433670429 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632781509188 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140087857819 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446625643208 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.96 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.