The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the frequency of eating at fast food restaurants among people in the USA between the years 2003 and 2013. It is measured in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that there is a decrease by 1% from never eating to eating everyday.

At the beginning, in the years 2003, 2006 and 2013 people that eat fast food frequently and also the ones that certainly don’t is low compared to the population that consumes it between several times a week and a few times a year (approximately 3% to 4%).

However, the people in the USA who consumes once a week had the highest rate of somehow 33% even in the years 2006 and once or twice a month in the year 2013.

At the end, we can say that over the years (in 2013), American people are eating less at fast food restaurants than the previous years (2003 and 2006).

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...rease by 1% from never eating to eating everyday. At the beginning, in the years 2003,...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 682.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42857142857 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44432869919 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538961038961 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 198.0 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4008085127 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205509696403 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109654937042 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104542629715 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136091110361 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438638181915 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.