The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps below illustrates the entry to the city hospital from the city road in 2007 and in 2010. Overall, there is a massive change done by the years in the structure of the road and some new sectors popped up.

To begin with, in 2007 the City Hospital’s plan was very minimalistic that contained a small public and staff car parking (in the same area) on the south east of the City Hospital. On the other hand, in the year 2010 the top view seemed very modern due to the existence of the roundabouts that are connected to new sections and lead to the entrance of the hospital.

However, the bus station in the year 2007 was on the east side of the hospital whereas in 2010 it moved to the west south which is connected with two roundabouts. The small main parking that was in the first map (2007) has split into two major parking where the staff has its own in the existing space and a new public parking has been established on the east of the City Hospital on the right of the Ring Road.

In conclusion, the City Hospital’s plan has changed to have a three roundabouts to access the entry of the hospital with new sectors shown in the year 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, whereas, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40366972477 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44799886153 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463302752294 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8289265214 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270706320236 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142269956981 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113034585827 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180159377037 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685183696229 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.