The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given two maps show road access plan of a city hospital and other features around it for the years 2007 and 2010. Both the maps are clear and cohesive representations.

In the year 2007, the main hospital building is connected to the city road via single lane marked as hospital road on the map. Along this road there are 3 bus stops on each side of road. Also, there is only one parking lot for both the staff and the visitors on the east side of this road. Besides a ring road goes around the central building and remains unchanged even in 2010.

However, for the year 2010 some major changes can be seen. The bus station has been completely moved to a separate area to the west of the hospital road and the parking on the eat has been set up exclusively for staff members. The public one has been shifted to the east of the main building and is connected to the ring road. Also, 2 roundabouts have been added at the northern and southern junctions of the hospital road.

Overall it can be seen that though the basic layout of the areas looks similar in both years, however the space is more well utilized in the year 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of the hospital road and the parking on the eat has been set up exclusively for staff m...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, look, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40094339623 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18897911901 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52358490566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4846026439 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8181818182 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247222187394 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101667320851 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988388603873 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161331741279 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106734934032 0.0819641961636 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.