The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting that main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts below illustrates the approximate rate of typical meals of three types of nutrients, in which eating too often may be unhealthy. Units are measured in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that there is a high percentage in eating Sodium and Saturated fats at night (Dinner) and an amount of Added sugar consumed in Snacks.
At the beginning, USA people in the morning (Breakfast time) consume the least amount of nutrients of a meal per day they eat 14% of Sodium and 16% of Saturated fat and Added sugar. At lunch time the percentage of nutrients eaten by Americans is higher than in the morning, 29% of Sodium is eaten in addition to 26% of Saturated fat and 19% of Added sugar.
However, after lunch people in America munch snacks and the rate of the Added sugar nutrient is mostly eaten by 42% compared to the other two nutrients (Sodium 14% and Saturated fat 21%). At night, Americans eat Sodium and Saturated fat nutrients more than Added sugar, they consume somehow 43% of Sodium, 37% of Saturated fat and 23% of added sugar.
In the end, USA people have a high percentage of eating meals containing these three nutrients after lunch (Snacks) and at night (Dinner) while they consume a small rate of them in the morning and at lunch. People and especially Americans should limit the percentage of eating these kinds of nutrients in order to stay healthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (USA) must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...d in Snacks. At the beginning, USA people in the morning Breakfast time consume t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70661157025 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4480288875 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46694214876 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3312466937 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.555555556 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106545678547 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626758447239 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971439503715 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872260150896 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851346179696 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.