The chart below shows information about the amount of reader of the age of 16-29 and 30+ who use device for reading.
The bar graph offers details regarding the percentage of readers that use different electronic gadgets for reading between the age group of above 30 and below 30.
It can be noted that desktops or laptops were highly preferred devices among the age group of below 30 years and nearly 55 percent of people from this age group preferred to read through personal computers. Whereas 46 percent of people from age of above 30 years used E-Reader; while, half of these people from below 30 years used E-Reader.
Mobile phones were the second preferred device among age below 30 and nearly 41 percent of them utilized handy. Additionally, tablets were least popular among this age group and only 16 percentage used this gadget. Likewise, cellphones and tablets users were nearly the same in above 30 age about 25 percentage and 26 percentage respectively.
Thus personal computers were the more popular choice for reading purposes and tablets were least preferred between both the age groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-27 | Kaishal Ozarker | 73 | view |
- A hundred years ago people thought that human race was steadily improving in every area of life Now it seems this is not certain in all situations In which areas do you think we have made important progress nowadays In which areas do you think we still ne 61
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development 73
- Park Map 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the cast Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...tage and 26 percentage respectively. Thus personal computers were the more popula...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10429447853 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4430276722 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533742331288 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4383245245 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299406048939 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154182263342 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639939436398 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194002790845 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685961793963 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.