The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following chart depicts how house prices changed in average in five distinctive cities during 1990 till 2002 while the comparison base year was 1989.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, the comparison is made in two different courses including 1990 to 1995 and 1996 to 2002. At the first period, unlike Madrid and Frankfort which experienced a slight increase around 1% and 2%, respectively, other three cities witnessed a remarkable decline. House prices of both London and Tokyo went down nearly 7% in comparison with 1989 and it was 5% decline in New York at the same period.
Turing to 1996 to 2002, there was a sharp climb in prices of houses of London which was more than 10%. Followed by 5% in New York, around 4% of Madrid, and 1% of Frankfort. Tokyo, however, submitted a 5% decline in average house prices at the same era.
It is clear from the diagram that, in the second period, population of four cities, except Frankfort, suffered from rising in house prices, where as in the previous course, that is 1990 to 1995, only two cities of Madrid and Frankfort observed a gradual rise in house prices in comparison with 1989.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
..., suffered from rising in house prices, where as in the previous course, that is 1990 to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69801980198 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44689204068 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579207920792 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5119202438 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310748370066 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138821955164 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10016805462 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215210959225 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750746566946 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.