the chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000.
summarise the information by selected and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compare the proportion of fitness membership between man and woman from 1970 to 2000. overall, it can be seen that fluctuated change in every periods.
Men, during the period 1970 to 2000 has a great decrease in 1995, over 5000 Men members. Yet, Male membership has dramatically fallen in 2000, there was only 1000, fourth times lower member than in year 1995. At 1975, male members was a second higher for count membership, it was peaked at 4000 members. Male membership value in 1970 and 1990 stuck at 2000 persons. however, at 1980 was slightly fall from near 3000 to only almost 2000 at 1985.
Woman has remained value with fluctuated volume, there was a high proportion it is only near to 3000 members in 1985 and 1995. the last, female fitness member peaked at 1970, only 1000 and that was hit a low of male members in period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...etween man and woman from 1970 to 2000. overall, it can be seen that fluctuated change ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 366, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...in 1970 and 1990 stuck at 2000 persons. however, at 1980 was slightly fall from near 30...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fallen'.
Suggestion: fallen
... persons. however, at 1980 was slightly fall from near 3000 to only almost 2000 at 1...
^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... near to 3000 members in 1985 and 1995. the last, female fitness member peaked at 1...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 697.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58552631579 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2557924055 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598684210526 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 184.5 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.3772695712 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4444444444 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172908287665 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876222212004 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781082885214 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129640749105 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412868348469 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.