The chart below shows the number of internet users in three difference countries anh the world average between 1998 and 2013
The bar graph compares the number of internet users in Greece, Denmark, Canada and the world average over 15 years starting in 1998
Overall, it is clear that the number of internet users in Canada and Denmark was higher than that of other countries during the 15 years. In contrast, Greece had fewer users, which was close to the world average, but both gradually increased just as the other countries did
Locking at the graph, we can see that the proportion of Internet access in Denmark has quadrupled over the 15-year period, from 23,000 people to 95,000. In 1998 it had the second-highest number of internet users but it had surpassed Canada by 2003. Growth after 2013 was slow, but the common trend rapidly more than tripled from 1998 to 2013. Besides, it had grown up to 20,000 every 5 years. Although the world average climed as well, moving from about 3,000 users to 35,000 users, the gap between it and the three countries included in the chart had widened at the end of the period in the question
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nada and the world average over 15 years starting in 1998 Overall, it is clear t...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'lock'
Suggestion: Lock
...reased just as the other countries did Locking at the graph, we can see that the propo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, second, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64804469274 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25463122096 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.9904415638 43.030603864 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292641902461 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135380839151 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862541479481 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205280075735 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417005088133 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.