The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part time
Overall, it can be seen that there was a significant increase in the number of students in further education in Britain. In addition, full-time education was popular in Britain's education.
At the beginning of the period, the fulltime studying of men reached the peak at 1000 student in 1970/71 and then fell to nearly 800 students in 1980/81. This figure was higher than women, with 700 women students take part in the fulltime studying in 1970/71 and just under 800 students in 1980/81. The part-time studying of men was at least twice as high as those for women in 1970/71, with about 100 and 50 students respectively. By 1980/81, both women and men were a dramatic increase in part-time studying, around 190 and 200 students.
At the end of the period, the number for full-time education women experienced the fastest growth, hit the highest points of 1.100 students in 1990/91, while figures for men remained stable at the same time. The part-time education was similar in both gender in 1990/91, with over 200 students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'student' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'students'.
Suggestion: students
...tudying of men reached the peak at 1000 student in 1970/71 and then fell to nearly 800 ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der in 1990/91, with over 200 students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91954022989 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59719250437 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4969134626 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298433016961 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145013787555 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247337147115 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201960655536 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104783199543 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.