Information depicting enrolled students in further education programs, categorised by gender, is provided as a bar chart. The data is displayed for two decennia, from 1970/71 to 1990/91 for full-time and part-time studies, with units in thousands (abbreviated with ‘K’ in the text below).
A feature that can immediately be discerned from the chart, is the large discrepancy in enrollment volume between full-time and part-time education, where full-time students comprise only a fraction in overall enrollment numbers. Another noticeable key facet is the more or less gradual increase in enrollment numbers in full-time education for both, men and women, however no similar behaviour for part-time students can be observed.
In more detail we see that male student enrollments, studying part-time, reached its peak in 1970/71 with a total of 1000K students, which then declined to just below 900K students in 1980/81 and rised slightly again in 1990/91 to a little over 900K students. During the same period, a rather monotonic steady increase is observed in full-time education, starting at just above 100K male students in 1970/71 to slightly over 200K in 1990/91.
Enrollment numbers for female part-time students with nealy 800K have been significantly smaller in 1970/71 vis-a-vis their male counterparts. But the numbers steadily increased during the next two decades to almost 1100K students. Looking at full-time students, a significant jump is observed in 1980/81, with about 200K students, which is up by 150K from 1970/71. A slight increase can again be observed in 1990/91.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, then, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52845528455 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9017101861 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577235772358 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6148496657 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228113030411 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978328672775 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615392022129 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153685373601 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655691812392 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.