Imprisonment is typically the punishment for criminal behaviour and is a de facto standard worldwide. Nonetheless, there are concerns whether imprisonment constitutes the most effective method in relation how to deal with criminals. Alternative solutions are put forth, one of which embraces education as a crime prevention tool. I argue, however, that education alone cannot in and by itself serve as an effective solution for crime prevention.
The notion that education can be a prime crime preventer is farcical on its face and is not supported by any serious statistics. A prime example that illustrates this fact can readily be uncovered when considering the worldwide recession starting in late 2009, which was primarily caused by unethical and often unlawful acts of higly educated individuals in the finance industry. Few of the actors at the centre of this scandal actually went to prison, while millions of ordinary people worldwide lost money, jobs and even their homes.
On the other hand, when looking at incarceration rates, the US is world leader and imprisons a large percentage of their poor population, many of whom are people of colour. Whilst this specific circumstance can be quite uniquely attributed to the US criminal system, given some of their harsh crimal laws leading to life imprisonment for petty crimes, it nonetheless exemplifies that criminal law does not neccessarily encapsulate true justice. Noone should go to jail for dealing with marihuana, let alone serve a life sentence.
In conclusion I argue that the criminal system is biased in favour towards the wealthy and the mighty and does not actually reflect what many would consider a fair justice system. It is my contention that in order to prevent crimes, the discrepancy between poor and rich has to be addressed so that people can actually pursue a life of happiness without having to worry about their next pay check.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onetheless exemplifies that criminal law does not neccessarily encapsulate true j...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, while, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2064516129 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86465416697 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.9408248444 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183122965784 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654162598395 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442685431121 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103643989332 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556848457706 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.