The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.
Energy from geothermal production has been a relative carbon neutral electricity source for decades. The diagram depicts the associated processes that are involved to basically generate electricity from cold water using naturally occurring subsurface heat. Overall, there are five separate steps involved before electrical power is ready for further consumption.
Initially, cold water resources are pumped through an injection well to relative large depths of about 4.5 km. At these depths the cold water encounters a geothermal zone, which is a subsurface region of elevated thermal activity, creating a hot rock environment in its vicinity. As the cold water percolates through the hot rock fracture zone it absorbs the heat from the environment until the water reaches a second well, the production well.
As the hot water is pumped up through the production well, it arrives in the condenser, functioning as a catchment for the water steam, which subsequently drives the turbine that is generating electricity. The final product is carbon neutral electricity ready for further consumption.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63473053892 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92359098941 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6599849361 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0720592330699 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346041200248 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410885930272 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520064106721 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398658814397 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.