The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts give information regarding the number of people (male and female) choosing full-time and part-time education in Britain during three periods since 1970. It is immediately apparent that taking full-time education showed its superiority, in men and women, over another further education in Britain. In addition, only did the figure for the male in full-time education experience a decrease and an increase while there was a growth in male’s number of part-time education and in both educations figure for the female during the period.
Regarding the male’s interest, full-time education stood at around 1000 in 1970/71, witnessing a noticeable decline to nearly 850, and then jumped gradually to 900 at the end of the period. At the same time, part-time education saw a slight rise from about 100 –the minimum number of male’s preferable education– to 200 during the period.
Turning to the female’s chart, there was a similar pattern for full-time education and part-time education between period 1970/71 and 1990/91. While the former grew significantly, rising from nearly 700 to around 1100 – the largest number of preferable education, the latter rose gradually, before leveling of almost 200 at the end of the period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45408163265 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88818775154 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.2627143099 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.714285714 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335286291883 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195201490665 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950486642789 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243980278969 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872877632318 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.