The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015.
The provided data enumerates how many passengers used public transport in London town between 2012 and 2015. As is observed, the number of passengers taking the tram witnessed the biggest growth, whereas those of passengers taking the bus and train fluctuated over the 4-year period.
As far as the details are concerned, initially in 2012, the number of people taking the bus was nearly thrice that of people taking the train. This gap between these two categories reduced over the next four years until 2015, the year of which tram became the predominant means of transportation that attracted nearly 100 passengers per day.
It is also conspicuous that the train was the most popular public transport in 2012, having 80 passengers daily. However, just one year later, this figure slid rapidly to only 10 passengers a day. This number recovered and steadily grew to 35 in 2014 and to 65 in 2015, making train the second most popular form of transportation at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-28 | amritkumar | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | Fara Has | view | |
| 2021-06-22 | dinhthu05 | view | |
| 2020-09-18 | nagakhoa | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-02 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
- Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views 89
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 67
- There is no need to go out to see live cinema because it is better to see them on the TV or computer screen Do you agree or disagree 11
- These days, a great number of children prefer spending time on computer games rather than on sports. Why Is it a positive or negative development? 89
- The supplied diagram enumerates the amount of financial investment in research by the U S government from 1980 to 2008
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92814371257 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59156253056 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6097034809 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258402663703 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128317713021 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933996158008 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187234460403 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714338357413 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.