The bar chart illustrates how many people were travelling using three big airports in New York City in a period of time spanning from 1995 to 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that LaGuardia had the most significant growth during these years compared to the other two airports which did not event reach 50,000,000 passengers in any year.
In 1995, almost 35 millions of passengers chose LaGuardia airport rather than John F. Kennedy and Newark whom figures are around 25,000,000 and 15,000,000 respectively. However, the situation changed in the following two years when travellers from John F. Kennedy doubled and overtook by 5 million the ones from LaGuardia whereas Newark was the least airport used with a figure of just below 40,000,000 passengers.
From 1998 to 2000, while departures and arrivals from Newark remained more or less steady, LaGuardia saw a considerable rise settling at just below 70 millions of passengers. As regard to John F. Kennedy, this airport decreased in 1998 lowering under 40 millions of passengers but restarted to increase in 1999, achieving just above 40,000,000 passengers in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hree big airports in New York City in a period of time spanning from 1995 to 2000. Overall...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '35 million'.
Suggestion: 35 million
...sengers in any year. In 1995, almost 35 millions of passengers chose LaGuardia airport rath...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '70 million'.
Suggestion: 70 million
...onsiderable rise settling at just below 70 millions of passengers. As regard to John F. Kenned...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '40 million'.
Suggestion: 40 million
...irport decreased in 1998 lowering under 40 millions of passengers but restarted to increase in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21546961326 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74815093606 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685082872928 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0031445608 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130364372898 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061054120165 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814284749368 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105118005465 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103562225045 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.