The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given bar chart provides the information about the annual frequencies by which travellers visited three most important airports in New York city over a period of 5 years, from 1995 to 2005.

Overall, both LaGuardia’s and Newark’s airports experienced an upward trend throughout the period. The number of Newark’s visitors showed a fluctuating behaviour. La Guardia’s airport initially was the first airport for the number of visiting travellers and further, this was confirmed in 2000 when it far outraced the other two airports.

In 1995 the number of passengers visiting LaGuardia’s airport was about 35 million, being higher than both John F. Kennedy’s and Newark’s ones respectively, by approximately 10 and 20 million. Then it continued to rose slightly up to 50 million in 1999 and hitting the maximum point of about just below 70 million one year later.

Newark’s visitors were just about 25 million in 1995 and they slightly rose in number up to 1998, when they outraced John F.Kennedy’s visitors by about 6%. Then the figure remained steady up to the end of the period.

John F.Kennedy’s figure started at about 25% in 1995 and steeply rose, reaching approximately 48 million in 1997 , when it experienced its maximum popularity. Then it continued to decrease up to 1999 and a last steady increase bought it to reach more than 40 millions of visitors in 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...r up to 1998, when they outraced John F.Kennedy’s visitors by about 6%. Then the figure...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
... up to the end of the period. John F.Kennedy’s figure started at about 25% in 1995 a...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eaching approximately 48 million in 1997 , when it experienced its maximum popular...
^^
Line 9, column 257, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '40 million'.
Suggestion: 40 million
...y increase bought it to reach more than 40 millions of visitors in 2000.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96708101102 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8699744663 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.909090909 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152441156943 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599612139947 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063648420354 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963169402866 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743464366327 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.