The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given bar chart provides the information about the annual frequencies by which travellers visited three most important airports in New York city over a period of 5 years, from 1995 to 2005.

Overall, both LaGuardia’s and Newark’s airports experienced an upward trend throughout the period. The number of Newark’s visitors showed a fluctuating behaviour. La Guardia’s airport initially was the first airport for the number of visiting travellers and further, this was confirmed in 2000 when it far outraced the other two airports.

In 1995 the number of passengers visiting LaGuardia’s airport was about 35 million, being higher than both john.F.Kennedy’s and Newark’s ones respectively, by approximately 10 and 20 million. Then it continued to rose slightly up to 50 million in 1999 and hitting the maximum point of about just below 70 million one year later.

Newark’s visitors were just about 25 million in 1995 and they slightly rose in number up to 1998, when they outraced John F.Kennedy’s visitors by about 6%. Then the figure remained steady up to the end of the period.

John F.Kennedy’s figure started at about 25% in 1995 and steeply rose, reaching approximately 48 million in 1997, when it experienced its maximum popularity. Then it continued to decrease up to 1999 and a last steady increase bought it to reach more than 40 millions of visitors in 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Number
... an upward trend throughout the period. number of Newark’s visitors showed a fluctuati...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: F
...5 millions, being higher than both john.F.Kennedy’s and Newark’s ones respectivel...
^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...millions, being higher than both john.F.Kennedy’s and Newark’s ones respectively, by ap...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...r up to 1998, when they outraced John F.Kennedy’s visitors by about 6%. Then the figure...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...up to the end of the period. John F.Kennedy’s figure started at about 25% in 1995 a...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 257, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '40 million'.
Suggestion: 40 million
...y increase bought it to reach more than 40 millions of visitors in 2000.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24444444444 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08274048355 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6139685387 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157173059857 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638974937985 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634016246722 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972199689137 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073881845554 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.