The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates information about number of trips made by children to commute to school from home using various modes of transportations in two years: 1990 and 2010. Different medium for travel are car, cycle, bus, bus and walking, and walking.
Overall, car category had superceded walking as most popular way young students tripped two ways. Besides car passenger, number of annual trips for all other means of transportation has declined from 1990 to 2010 due to rise in preference of car.
Firstly, it is patently evident that number of travel per year for car has increased more than two folds during the period, starting at above 4 million to 11 million, while other mode of transport witnessed decline in the figure. This decline was drastic in number of cyclists, pedestrians and bus and walking. For cycle and bus combined with walking, the figure dropped to half of previous number. For cyclists, trips dropped to 6 million in 2010 and for bus and on foot user number reached around 3 million. Similarly, number of cycle trip had even worse result when figure of 6 million travel trips reduced to nearly one third in this phase. On other hand, category "bus" witnessed slight decline as compared to aforementioned ones. In 1990, the bus users were around 7 million but in 2010 the figure dropped down to 5.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 248, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: drastic
...decline in the figure. This decline was drastic in number of cyclists, pedestrians and bus and wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, similarly, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96475770925 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64743415507 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607929515419 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3599014677 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.454545455 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213893380201 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880523375296 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894630878312 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178181920369 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850013970103 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.