The given bar chart compares the report on the number of incidents and injuries(per 100 million PMT) that took place by five different transportation types in the year 2002.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the number was highest in both the scenarios in the context of demand response vehicles, while the least was witnessed from the commuter rail. However, incidents outweigh the injuries over the given period from all the vehicles.
According to the given illustration, nearly 225 incidents(per 100 million passenger miles traveled) were reported under the demand response type as compared to the others that remained below 100. Also, whilst the bus incidents reached on par with the light rail, at 76, the incidents from the commuter rail came out to be lower than half as reported by the heavy rail, at 51.
In contrast, out of the total injuries, about 173(per 100 million passenger miles traveled) fell under the demand response category, which was more than double the bus injuries(66 million). Besides, with just a marginal difference, injuries from the light and heavy rail were nearly the same(35 and 39 on the given scale). However, the commuter rail observed the least injuries, only 3(per 100 million passenger miles traveled) fewer than the number of incidents from the same transport.
- The chart below give information about levels of education in Glasgow a city in Scotland in 2010 89
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 in the UK 78
- 89
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 47
- 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17050691244 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53758512652 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543778801843 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.8999915312 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346111450017 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158687115353 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121199906955 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220481527564 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106318333973 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.