Depicted on the bar graph are data about the figures for research students enrolling in six science-related disciplines at a British institution by gender nine years after the millennium.
A pattern plainly in evidence is that taking these science courses was noticeably more prevalent for men, albeit by varying degrees, except for Veterinary medicine.
There was a lopsided disparity between the numbers of male and female students engaging in Physics, Astronomy, and Geology. The gender gap was particularly large in Physics which was pursued by more than 200 males against only 40 females. The same tendency was observed in the case of the other two disciplines as the numbers of male scholars tripled and doubled that of female ones in Astronomy and Geology, respectively.
Men and women were more equally represented in health-related subjects: Biology, Medicine and Veterinary medicine. In Biology, there were slightly fewer women (about 200) than men (about 230). This was also true for Medicine as 180 women and 200 men enrolled in the discipline. Going against the general pattern, Veterinary was the only course where women vaguely outnumbered men (roughly 110 women vs. 90 men).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ent for men, albeit by varying degrees, with the exception of Veterinary medicine. There was a lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun women is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...dicine. In Biology, there were slightly less women about 200 than men about 230 whic...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35227272727 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88475259263 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630681818182 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0815817491 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114135227498 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491725870959 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501935510785 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790136413089 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403609199121 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.