The graph illustrates the proportion of males and females in various age groups who regularly engaged in physical exercise in Australia in 2010.
Under the age of 45, the gender difference between these men and women was big in 2010. Most strikingly, 52.5% of women between 35 and 44 years old did regular physical activity while only 39.5% of their male counterparts did so. Also, between 25 and 34 years old, a higher proportion of women than men regularly engaged in physical exercise (48.9% and 42.2% respectively). In contrast, with regard to people between 15 and 24 years old, a higher percentage of males regularly exercised than that of females (52.8% and 47.4% respectively).
After reaching the age of 45, higher proportions of women than men engaged in regular physical activity. There was a gap of over 10% between males and females aged from 45 to 54 (43.1% and 53.3% respectively). This gap was less prominent for 55-to-64-year-olds (45.1% for men and 53% for women). The gender difference was minimal when it came to people aged 65 and over (around 47% for both men and women).
In sum, the older the men were, the lower the number of men who exercised regularly before 45, but after 45, an increasing proportion of them involved in such activities.
- The graph below compares changes in the both rates of China and the US between 1920 and 2000. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86574074074 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77091358682 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6717036922 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311934811628 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141280671639 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705632548469 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195343970674 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557015218485 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.