The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The graph indicates the gap in income between men and women in five countries within a 20-year period. Overall, all countries show the same reduction trends during the period, only Australia experienced an increase after 1998.

There was a difference of 50% in earnings between the two genders in Japan, while the U.S saw a number of 40% in 1978. Both countries then experienced a gradual reduce in 20 years and stopped at about 42% in Japan and about 37% in the U.S.

The UK and France observed the same decrease. The differences in the amount of money that men and women made in these two countries are lower than those of Japan and the U.S. From the figures of about 29% and 19% respectively, the UK and France saw a slow fall to 35% and 17% in 2008.

The lowest figure of Australia slowly fell from 1978 to 1998 then it increase sharply to about 23% to overtake the figure of France in the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...n the two genders in Japan, while the U.S saw a number of 40% in 1978. Both count...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a slow fall to 35% and 17% in 2008. The lowest figure of Australia slowly fell ...
^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...a slowly fell from 1978 to 1998 then it increase sharply to about 23% to overtake the fi...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4674556213 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3734228647 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562130177515 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0977333749 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136737885927 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715148847631 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489099741873 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784781507201 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231399521426 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.