The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart below depict the percentage of English and Welsh families in bought and leased housings in 1918 to 2011. Overall, it can be seen that owned and rented accommodations show opposite trends.

Looking at the chart in more detail, it can be seen that in 1918 bought housings stood at around 23%, while leased accommodations stood at approximately 78%. After that, in 1939, owned accommodations decreased to approximately 68% while leased housings rose to about 32%. Following 1939, in 1953 both purchased and leased accommodations remained at the same percentage, before both continued the previous trends in 1961. In 1971, both bought and rented housings stayed at the same percentage, 50%.

In 1981, the possessed housings started to rise to 60% while leased accommodations decreased to 40%. After that, in 1991 and 2001, bought accommodations continued to increase to approximately 68% and 69%, respectively, while leased accommodations kept decreasing to around 32% and 31%, respectively. Then in 2011, bought housings made a decrease to around 62% while leased accommodations increased to about 36%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accommodations continued to increase to approximately 68% and 69%, respectively,...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18750622248 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497142857143 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.884203183 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132477736793 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717560414909 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509756082947 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126613035169 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842288926093 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.