This diagram indicates the proportion of families owning and renting places to live in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
Before 1971, the percentage of households in owned accommodation surpassed that of households in rented accommodation and the gap between them reached a peak in 1981. Then, the gap was constantly narrowed from 55% in 1918 to 0 in 1971, excluding a levelling off from 1939 to 1953.
After 1971, there were more families in rented places than in owned places. In 1991 and 2001, the proportion of the former was almost twice as big as that of the latter and the gap rose to a peak of 40%. However, the gap then showed a slight decline to 30% in 2011 because of a marginal decrease in the proportion of households in owned accommodation and a minimal rise in the proportion of households renting accommodation.
In conclusion, it is clear that the general trend of households in owned accommodation was upward, while that of households in rented accommodation was downward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n England and Wales from 1918 to 2011. Before 1971, the percentage of household...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a levelling off from 1939 to 1953. After 1971, there were more families in ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of households renting accommodation. In conclusion, it is clear that the gene...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84482758621 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97148668547 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488505747126 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7479561512 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260967841057 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126207329585 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862238104583 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171972395656 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219708491935 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.