Nowadays, there is widespread concern regarding the previously neglected material abundance. Some people criticize that it is actually a kind of a waste for people to have too many choices. From my perspective, I think the diversity of the choices have fulfilled our lives.
Indeed, abundant choices tend to have some negative influences on society, especially the environment. The key reason lies in the fact that in order to satisfy the diversified demand, a large number of productions have to be manufactured, which consume plenty of resources. As a result, the exploitation of natural resources, to some extent, can undermine the environment in many ways, including air pollution, soil erosion and so on. Considering the productions not chose by customs, a great proportion of these productions may not be recycled and turned into rubbish, which is also a serious problem threating the environment.
However, this does not automatically mean that the disadvantages dwarf the advantages. On the contrary, the material abundance may positively affect society, whose innovation can be significantly promoted. If the supply of the choices is monotonous, people may lose the enthusiasm of coming up with new ideas. Consequently, new technologies and science guarantying the development of our society may be not invented or found. In addition, with the help of constantly developing technologies, some social problems mentioned above can be easily solved. For example, the rubbish caused by abundant choices may be recycled conveniently in the near future.
In conclusion, it is obvious that abundant choices play an important role in our society and the merits excel the demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
... people criticize that it is actually a kind of a waste for people to have too many choic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rder to satisfy the diversified demand, a large number of productions have to be manufactured, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43893129771 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19189187882 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0322700808 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12919961245 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460638252657 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750056506338 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795284733373 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742533667111 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.