The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar chart outlines the proportion of daily consumed products by men, women and children in the UK in 2003, 2006 and 2010.
Overall what stands out from the graph is that the share of fruit and vegetables that was consumed by adults was more higher than young generation's proportion in all periods. Moreover the peak share of consumed products amid adults was women.
Looking at the details, with comparing all years, the largest number of consumed resources in all categories was in 2006.
The highest figure for women who consume every day was 32% compared to 28% for men. An addition, the figure for children was 16%.
It is clear from the rest of figures, However the smallest share of people consuming the daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetables was children with only 11% in 2002, comparing with last year it was increasing to 14%. Comparing both years 2002 and 2010, the percentage of adults who consumed more products was in 2010, for male category was 22% and 24% respectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
2022-06-08 | Chloe Tran | 78 | view |
2022-05-18 | Cicihg | view | |
2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 70 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 56
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r chart outlines the proportion of daily consumed products by men, women and chil...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dren in the UK in 2003, 2006 and 2010. Overall what stands out from the graph i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...etables that was consumed by adults was more higher than young generations proportion in a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t was consumed by adults was more higher than young generations proportion in all...
^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... generations proportion in all periods. Moreover the peak share of consumed products ami...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsumed products amid adults was women. Looking at the details, with comparing a...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion, the figure for children was 16%. It is clear from the rest of figures, Ho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83139534884 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47433418067 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1813770669 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249183684651 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111377167266 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816769821485 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140668037852 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921862973651 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.