The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the result of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

The chart depicts coffee and tea consumption and buying habits of Australian people in five different cities as evident by a recent survey.

Overall, the highest percentage of people preferred to go to a café for their cup of coffee or tea, while the least amount of people bought fresh coffee to consume at home. The instant coffee use was in the middle of the two, except in Adelaide where it was the top form of coffee utilized.

It’s clear from the graph that most people in Sydney, Melbourne Brisbane and Hobart preferred to go to a coffee shop for their cup of brew. In all those cities more than 55% of people went to cafes, but the highest consumption was among citizens of Melbourne and Hobart at about 60%. The only city where it wasn’t the most favorite type of coffee was Adelaide, where instant coffee was slightly more popular at 50%.

In most areas, except Adelaide, the instant coffee was second most common form of coffee consumed, where on average 45% of people used it. The least drunk type of coffee in all cities was fresh coffee as on average 40% of people confirmed buying it in last 4 weeks.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, but the highest consumption was among citizens of Melbourne and Hobart at abou...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60396039604 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23635292046 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50495049505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.3088005735 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294240258944 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155373808248 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136854858174 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237935299977 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153700252157 0.0819641961636 188% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.