The chart depicts the conclusion drawn out from a survey questioning the frequency of people from five different Australian cities buying and drinking beverages, specifically coffee and tea.
Overall, one month prior to being asked in the survey, most people in these areas were partial to buy drinks at café rather than purchasing them in the form of fresh coffee or instant coffee.
As per the chart, people residing in Melbourne enjoyed coffee and tea at cafeterias the most with the percentage nearly cross the 65% mark. By the same token, coming in second place with a close number was Hobart, following by Sydney with over 60% of city residents gravitating toward beverages made by bartenders at local coffee shops.
Regarding the instant coffee consumption in these cities, the rate of Hobart residents also made up for the lion’s share of the chart for that matter. Noticeably, Adelaide city had approximately the same rate for café-goers and instant-coffee buyers clustered in the vicinity of 50%. Additionally, the ubiquity regarding the habit of buying instant coffee of those living in Melbourne and Sydney is also lower than the aforementioned cities with 48% and 45%, respectively. In addition, the city of Brisbane and Adelaide, witnessed a low rate of fresh-coffee buyers with a mere 35% as opposed to the prevalence of this norm in Sydney and Melbourne with the number clustering between 40% and 45%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, second, so, in addition, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15021459227 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82167217958 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587982832618 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.1844886027 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200743860138 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095639654911 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704235512181 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140578723705 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727427391284 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.