Some individuals feel that working from home, while of benefit to employees, is actually a drawback for employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the world is becoming more digitally integrated, working from home has gained significant ubiquity in this computerized era. As a result, stances are indicating that this working pattern can do wonders for workers, whereas it can take a toll on the leaders and managers of the company. From my perspective, I somewhat disagree with the statement, the reasons of which will be further elucidated in this essay.
To commence with, home working can bring about a host of advantages for workers. First and foremost, working in the comfort of one’s home allows one to cultivate time management. To specify, congestion during rush hour is one of the problems that employees have to face on a daily basis if they have to show up at their workplaces. However, by working from home, workers can cross this matter of their concerning list. To add further credence to my assertion, distant working also can help home workers to maintain work-life balance. This sense of equilibrium is stabilized since employees actively take charge of their day and how they want to make use of their time. For example, they can look after their children while answering e-mails, or checking daily news.
Not only does working from home stem a root of efficient working for employees but it also brings about different merits for the bosses. A tremendous advantage of this is that it helps employers to have a closer look at the task performance of people under their supervisors and management. This is made possible by a host of teamwork-centric applications like Trello, or Google Calendar, which can help the leaders to administrate the workload better. What is more, distance working is synonymous to cut down possible costs, such as the budget spent on renting properties can be used for cultivating human resources. On this account, a better labor force for the company will form up and benefit the enterprises in the long run.
In conclusion, I am in favor of the view that working from home can generate a variety of merits for the people within the company. All things considered, therefore, I somewhat disagree with the mentioned statement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99719887955 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80174502841 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560224089636 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5806461404 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.941176471 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228852836496 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780642408 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492056707665 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146707389327 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012403114812 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.