The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The given bar chart illustrates the result of a survey about the percentage of Australian city dwellers who were consuming and purchasing tea and coffee in the last four weeks in five different cities of Australia named Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Hobart.
Overall, as can be seen from the graph, the vast majority of dwellers in the cities were interested in going to a cafe for coffee or tea, and people prefer to buy instant coffee rather than fresh coffee.
To be more specific, regarding the first three cities, the residents who went to a coffee shop in the last four weeks remained higher than other figures, reached approximately 62% in Sydney, followed by 64% and around 55% in Melbourne and Brisbane, respectively. The figure for city residents who bought instant coffee appeared to have an upward trend in the order from Sydney to Brisbane, from about 45% to around 53%. The percentage of people buying fresh coffee was relatively low, at just 43% in Sydney, and decreased slightly to 42% in Melbourne. However, there was a sharp deceleration to nearly under 34% in Brisbane.
In terms of the other two areas, which are Adelaide and Hobart, the number of dwellers who purchased fresh coffee continued to be the lowest figure, just under 40% in both two cities. In Adelaide, residents getting instant coffee rose to the first ranked figure at exactly a half and then increased to about 55% in Hobart in the last four weeks. The figure for those who went to a café was relatively high, at nearly a half in Adelaide and reached about 63% in Hobart.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80147058824 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53929967118 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7602046502 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.111111111 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2222222222 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22283720309 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912462378741 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908820069077 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160539999293 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929307928105 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.