The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

A study on the buying and drinking habit of coffee and tea in five major cities in Australia during the past month is illustrated in the given bar graph.

As per the survey, it is clear that most of these city dwellers went to a café and had either tea or coffee in the past four weeks with an exception in case of Adelaide’s residents.

It is clear from the chart that, the habit of buying fresh and instant coffee was almost similar in both Sydney and Melbourne. When around 42 to 44% of their residents bought fresh coffee, the rate of those who bought instant coffee ranged between 45 and 48. However, most residents from these cities went to a café for coffee or tea (between 61 and 64%), which was almost similar to the city of Hobart’s.

Turning to the purchase of instant coffee in particular, a similar rate of residents of Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart had this habit (between 51 and 54%). It is to be noted that most Adelaide’s residents preferred this. Except in Hobart, the rate of those who had other two habits was seen comparatively less. Those who bought fresh coffee in these cities accounted for about 35%, while in Hobart, it was 3% more.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, well, while, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55450236967 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38751572801 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507109004739 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4817002818 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169752646562 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780779753999 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588450900335 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122628626043 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510399747425 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.